OP Auto Clicker vs TinyTask

It depends on what you're automating. OP Auto Clicker wins for raw click speed (100+ CPS vs TinyTask's ~30 CPS), open-source transparency (MIT license vs closed source), and smaller file size (512 KB vs 33 KB — TinyTask wins on file size). TinyTask wins for recording sequences (record then play back complex multi-step macros, OP Auto Clicker only does repeating clicks). For pure auto-clicking, OP Auto Clicker. For recorded macros across multiple windows, TinyTask.

Both are clean on VirusTotal. OP Auto Clicker has the advantage of being open source — you can read every line of the code on GitHub. TinyTask is closed source, so you trust the developer's distribution. TinyTask has a longer history (2008+) with no major security incidents. Both are safe; OP Auto Clicker is more verifiable.

No. TinyTask records and plays back at the speed you recorded — capped around 30 CPS for sustained recording. OP Auto Clicker generates synthetic clicks at any interval down to 1 ms (1000 CPS theoretical), reliably hitting 100+ CPS in real-world use. For high-CPS gaming or idle farming, OP Auto Clicker wins by 3×.

Yes — TinyTask is free for personal use. The developer offers paid upgrades (TinyTask Pro) for advanced features like loop counts and timing variables, but the core record-and-play feature is free.

Yes — they don't conflict. OP Auto Clicker handles repeating clicks at one position, TinyTask handles recorded multi-step macros. Some users run TinyTask for setup steps (open inventory, click menu, etc.) then hand off to OP Auto Clicker for the actual repeating click portion.